SkincareAddiction FAQ How to post About us Verified flair Related subs More Help Routine order Expanding your routine How to patch test Shaving Reduce, Reuse, Recycle Mental healthĭiscussion day (text-post only) & No/Low Buy ThreadsĬasual Friday (Humor, Cringe, Selfies, B&As are allowed General Chat) Skincare Core ▹▹ The ScA Routine ◃◃ Cleansers Moisturizers Sunscreen ▹▹ Search the sub ◃◃Įverything.on Skin Concerns (acne, PIH, and more!). Don't spam your blog, your product, your anything That case was settled and dismissed with prejudice.Quick Links Valid Title Tags COVID-19 Megathread RulesĤ. In 2018, a woman claimed Marcum and others committed professional conduct violations in an attempt to defraud her regarding her mobile home that was destroyed by fire. It still is pending in Mingo Circuit Court. Marcum denied the allegations and sought to have the case dismissed. Last year, Marcum was sued after a man was injured when a porch railing broke at a building he owned. The case has been assigned to Circuit Judge Miki Thompson. In the complaint, Marcum stipulates that so long as the case remains in circuit court he neither will seek nor accept more than $25,000 in the case, including attorney fees but excluding interest and costs. Marcum accuses the company of manufacturing defect or construction, negligence, breach of warranty – implied warranty of merchantability, breach of warranty – implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose and failure to warn. He says the company also knew of the skin problems associated with the product as early as 2016, but it continued to market and sell it. He says Procter & Gamble knew or should have known of the potential risks associated with using the product. He says he also suffered extreme pain and suffering as well as extreme nuisance and aggravation. He was prescribed two medications to treat the burns. Marcum sought medical treatment for the injuries, incurring medical bills. He also says skin is “peeling off in chunks” from the brief use of the deodorant. Three days later, he says he noticed painful burns, armpit irritation and rashes in the same location where he used the deodorant. It’s still being sold and marketed.”Īccording to his complaint, Marcum purchased Old Spice Fiji with Palm Tree deodorant on June 15 and began using it. Then, I saw so many other people have had this issue. “I’ve never had that problem with any other deodorant. “There have even been some class actions that were tried, but the judge said everybody’s damages were different,” Marcum said. Marcum said there have been thousands of similar lawsuits filed in recent years. “The reason I moved forward with filing was because they continue to market and sell the same product.” “I have permanent scarring from it still. “That stuff really caused severe chemical burns,” Marcum told The West Virginia Record. He is a former member of the House of Delegates who also ran for state Senate Marcum is an attorney with Next Step Legal in Williamson. Procter & Gamble sells and markets Old Spice. Justin Marcum filed the complaint earlier this month in Mingo Circuit Court against The Procter and Gamble Manufacturing Company, which is based in Cincinnati, Ohio. WILLIAMSON – A Mingo County attorney and former state lawmaker has filed a lawsuit seeking $25,000 after he says Old Spice deodorant caused severe burns, irritation and rashes on his armpits.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |